I had not heard
of many of them, so apart from his exhortations to start reading their output in
the original language and thus you should learn French, Italian, Spanish, German
and Russian, it was highly interesting to hear of all these (mainly) 20th
Century personalities and their lives and works inspired and determined by, but
also defied, that most lethal of centuries.
He is especially good at
pre-Anschluss Vienna’s coffee house culture. (k.u.k. Vienna even gets its own
introduction. I always thought k.u.k. stood for Kaffee und Kuchen, but no, it’s
‘kaiserlich und königlich’, an abbreviation for the Austrian-Hungarian empire)
with its large cast of geniuses great and small proclaiming upon the world. All
essays are built around quotes of aphorisms and epigrams by their subject. His
favourites are obviously (they have longest essays devoted to them) Egon
Friedell, Georg Lichtenberg, and Arthur Schnitzler, with Jean-Paul Sartre as his
favourite philosophical and hypocritical bogeyman popping up everywhere. The
fact that they were mainly Jewish (just like many of the German entries) is a
leitmotif but it must be remembered that they were not a separate category in
their societies (only Hitler made them so, not before).
James is an inveterate
liberal democrat and thus rails constantly against the century’s dictators and
totalitarianisms (be they Fascist, Nazi, or Communist – with some explicit
criticism of multiculturalism too in the aftermath of Islamic terrorism at the
time of writing). What they have done to destroy European culture is not just a
Holocaust story, as Stalin and Mao also did their damnedest to root out
intellectuals in their societies – this is always the surest and fastest way to
genocide.
A large number of essays are elegiac in tone because of the acute loss
suffered for any country that was ruled or occupied by non-democratic systems.
Stay or run and collaborate or resist were not always easy options and James is
generous to the individuals and their choices they made (and lived or died by
them).
James almost never fails to mention where he got his books from during a
lifetime of globe trotting to collect them in markets and second hand bookshops
around the world. Detailed prescriptions of their paper quality, print, binding
and covers get a bit tedious. Since he packed that massive volume of reading
(and understanding) into his life of reviewing, broadcasting, interviewing and
comedy routines, one has to marvel at when he could find the time to cheat on
his wife!
He posits that every book has its best page, and in this book it is
page 400 where he exasperatedly admits that “male homosexual promiscuity is
impossible to imagine” (for a straight male). It made me laugh out loud since
his argument is that “it doesn’t sound like enjoyment” and “Can all these
targets [male partners] be seen as beautiful?” He is genuinely puzzled by
Christopher Isherwood being a sexual decathlete in the Turkish bath, and
Constantine Cavafy’s poems are dreaming about nothing else. But he thankfully
comes to the sensible conclusion that in a rational world, anybody could be
attractive, even if he cannot imagine it.
No comments:
Post a Comment